• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Reply-to munging
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:53:43 -0400
• References: <r01050400-1025-E0CC3C4C71B911D794E90003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

[Simon St.Laurent]

> uche.ogbuji@f... (Uche Ogbuji) writes:
> >The question of whether or not to munge reply-to is a guaranteed
> >flame-war starter, but I just wanted to put in my 2c that XML-DEV does
> >this rightly, regardless of other technical issues.
> 
> And I agree with Uche on this point, adding that I wish more people
> would trim the recipients list when they reply.
> 

+1

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • Re: Reply-to munging
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Joint ownership of the data-dataContainer combination
• Next by Date: RE: Joint ownership of the data-dataContainer combinati on
• Previous by thread: Re: Reply-to munging
• Next by thread: Re: What is XML's appropriate place in an office suite?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread