• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 20:14:48 -0400
• In-reply-to: <005501c303ab$ea82afb0$6401a8c0@tbp1>

tpassin@c... (Thomas B. Passin) writes:
>Yes, yes, but you don't gotta support the schema __authoring__
>capability in the low end versions, just the ability to use one if it
>shows up.  That is more likely how schemas would be used at home and
>in small businesses anyway, I would think - someone comes up with a
>useful schema and lots of people want to use it.

Thinking back to Jon Bosak's keynote at XML 2002, UBL seems perfect for
that kind of application.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,825911,00.asp

Word does make a handy tool for reading orders and invoices, Access is
good for storing them, and Excel is good for analyzing them.  They just
need a little bit of smarts.



-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• Next by Date: Re: The Zen of xml-dev
• Previous by thread: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• Next by thread: RE: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread