Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Yes. On the other hand, I author schemas in PFE, parse them in IE, cross check them in Visual Studio.Net and Topologi, and that works. The problem, as I see it, is not discrimination against the low-cost product or user, but against the integration via XML of the content produced. Again, it should be a basic right of the content owner to be able to get the content out of the proprietary system into a system-neutral format of the owner's choosing or design. It is not the vendor's responsibility, I agree, to enable the design yet also not to force the choice. The fact of the WWW the fact of MS ubiquity in the toolsets used there does make supporting this basic right an MS responsibility. len -----Original Message----- From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:tpassin@c...] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 7:06 PM To: xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version? [Bullard, Claude L (Len)]> > Ya gotta support user-defined schemas in low end products. Yes, yes, but you don't gotta support the schema __authoring__ capability in the low end versions, just the ability to use one if it shows up. That is more likely how schemas would be used at home and in small businesses anyway, I would think - someone comes up with a useful schema and lots of people want to use it. Cheers, Tom P ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
