• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Data streams and schema use and identification
• From: Dan Vint <dvint@m...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:00:51 -0700
• In-reply-to: <f5badeg5odh.fsf@e...>
• References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030423111522.0296a028@m...><5.2.1.1.2.20030423080053.02ee7e98@m...><5.2.1.1.2.20030422121632.02dd81f0@p...><5.2.1.1.2.20030422121632.02dd81f0@p...><5.2.1.1.2.20030423080053.02ee7e98@m...><5.2.1.1.2.20030423111522.0296a028@m...>

At 08:46 AM 4/24/2003 +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>2) The W3C XML Schema WG was convinced that the needs of document
>authors to state their claims of document type and the needs of
>applications to protect themselves could not _both_ be satisfied by
>any form of _required_ connection between documents and schemas, so we
>made _all_ such connections hints.

So rather than looking at something like XML/SGL catalogs as a mechanism to 
appease both or make it manageable we have "hints" and those "hints" are 
not even required to be there. I could live within the bounds of hints, but 
none of them are required to be there - which is my issue.

..dan 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Data streams and schema use and identification
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• References:
  • Re: Data streams and schema use and identification
    • From: Dan Vint <dvint@m...>
  • Re: Data streams and schema use and identification
    • From: Dan Vint <dvint@m...>
  • Data streams and schema use and identification
    • From: Danny Vint <dvint@m...>
  • Re: Data streams and schema use and identification
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: Data streams and schema use and identification
• Next by Date: Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
• Previous by thread: Re: Data streams and schema use and identification
• Next by thread: Re: Data streams and schema use and identification
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread