[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: The non-future of XHTML x.x [LONG]

• To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: The non-future of XHTML x.x [LONG]
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:02:33 -0000
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1022-B5378AE2FE3B11D696190003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> 
> Netscape definitely did sell Navigator in boxes you could get 
> at CompUSA, but there was always a way around, usually 
> through evaluation copies.  I think most of the people who 
> actually paid for it were probably looking to get on the 
> Internet, period.
> 
I remember a time when their licensing terms were such that many
corporates preferred to pay a modest fee rather than risk being sued for
using free copies in ways that contravened the license conditions.

Michael Kay

• References:
  • Re: The non-future of XHTML x.x [LONG]
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Stalled browser development...
• Next by Date: Re: [OASIS members] OASIS TC Call for Participation: Content AssemblyMechanism
• Previous by thread: Re: The non-future of XHTML x.x [LONG]
• Next by thread: Re: The non-future of XHTML x.x [LONG]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread