|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
At 07:52 AM 11/2/2002 -0500, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: >At 4:47 PM -0500 11/1/02, Ann Navarro wrote: > > >>That's not what I'm referring to. You may think uniform names are good, >>but I'm hearing/reading that you think it's perfectly acceptable to force >>average document authors to write internal DTD subsets to be able to >>write "Pepsi ™". > >I think you're asking the wrong people to fix the wrong problem. There is >a usability issue here. However, that issue is not that ™ must be >declared in an internal DTD subset. ™ is not very usable in itself. >I almost always type &tm; and then have to debug my mistake. But this is >really the usability problem, isn't it? I believe it's a usability problem, but it's not the one I'm addressing. No one has yet answered the question.....do we *really* expect the average document author (who has not written, nor may even have control of, the DTD) to add internal/external subsets in order to use a frequently needed character? That's what we're asking of people, and I think we've failed if we leave it at that. I'll have to leave the argument at that point -- as I'm headed out for a much-anticipated vacation -- rather than worrying about entities, I'll be blowing bubbles while poking around some shipwrecks off St. Maarten. See y'all next week. Ann ----- Ann Navarro, WebGeek, Inc. http://www.webgeek.com say what? http://www.snorf.net/blog
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








