Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
Rick Jelliffe scripsit: > I think there is middle approach between John Cowan's "It is a question of justice" > approach and Michael Kay's "This is of marginal value compared to the costs" which > I certainly understand. What was a question of justice was to get the "new" scripts into the XML standard. Implementation of it by any particular system is a local question which should be answered according to local needs. Adding the new name characters avoids the "usable xor standard" dilemma; adding the newline conventions avoids the "well-formed xor plaintext" dilemma. People who do not need XML 1.1 need not worry about it until their business partners start to send it. Then they should find plenty of tools available. -- Not to perambulate || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format