[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published

• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:05:17 -0400
• Cc: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3DADB526.9030806@t...>; from tbray@t... on Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:51:18AM -0700
• References: <200210161300.JAA05455@m...> <3DADB526.9030806@t...>
• Reply-to: veillard@r...
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:51:18AM -0700, Tim Bray wrote:
> Why doesn't 1.1 just say "Processors must validate at user option"? 
> I.e. this is behavior that can be turned off.  Then you know what's 
> going to happen.  -Tim

  Because that would force any XML-1.1 conformant processor to implement
normalization checking, and we are doubtful about its feasability.
CR stage is the right time to get feedback on this issue, so if there are
pointers to algorithm, code, existing processors doing such checking
we would really appreciate implementation comments on this issue (then
please provide a copy of the mail to the list
www-xml-blueberry-comments@w... ).

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@r...  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• References:
  • Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation
• Previous by thread: Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
• Next by thread: Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread