[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published

• To: veillard@r...
• Subject: Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:47:41 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: elharo@m... (Elliotte Rusty Harold), jcowan@r... (John Cowan), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20021016075816.U27304@r...> from "Daniel Veillard" at Oct 16, 2002 07:58:16 AM

Daniel Veillard scripsit:

>   Just to put some emphasis to what John Cowan already said, I'm afraid
> of the cost of normalizing on-the-fly, the algorithms I could found
> in the Unicode annexes were just scary (in term of complexity and memory
> requirement) maybe there is simpler lean and cheap normalization 
> algorithms (I would like pointers ;-) but definitely that cost is better
> done once at generation time. Apparently normalization checking is
> slightly lighter and as said that check is optional c.f. 2.13 wording.

ICU is, as always, the gold standard for this kind of thing.  It has
both normalizing and normalization-checking algorithms.

-- 
John Cowan                              <jcowan@r...>
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              http://www.reutershealth.com
Unified Gaelic in Cyrillic script!
        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Celticonlang

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • XML Specs (was Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces
• Previous by thread: Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
• Next by thread: XML Specs (was Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread