[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1

• To: vdv@d... (Eric van der Vlist)
• Subject: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 06:37:19 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1035195812.28051.96.camel@ibook> from "Eric van der Vlist" at Oct 21, 2002 12:23:31 PM

Eric van der Vlist scripsit:

> > Be liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you send.
> 
> Looks like a good one line summary of my long post !
> 
> If everyone took this advise literally, nobody would ever send XML 1.1,
> though :=) ...

No, I assure you the Ethiopian XML Interest Group (a real organization,
though I may not have got their name quite right) is more than eager
to do so.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer
mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality
is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction,
as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract.
       --_Specht v. Netscape_

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Next by Date: Re: Java package for XPath 1.0
• Previous by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread