[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: parser models

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: parser models
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:49:29 -0400
• In-reply-to: <200209232155.RAA03235@m...>

John Cowan writes:
> > Cool.  Can/will Shemp/XOM deal with cases where information isn't
> > well-formed?  That seems to be one of the key entertainments in
> > moving between events and trees.
> 
> No.  XOM is meant for XML, not random markup.

I take it you mean "complete XML documents" as opposed to "XML documents
in the often messy process of creation".

That's another aspect of XML processing that's been sadly neglected.

Oh well.  More territory to explore, I suppose.

-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: parser models
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: parser models
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: parser models
• Next by Date: RE: Fwd: War of Attrition (was: Underwhelmed(WAS: XOM micro tutorial))
• Previous by thread: Re: parser models
• Next by thread: Re: parser models
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread