[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: parser models

• To: simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent)
• Subject: Re: parser models
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:44:13 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-CFCEFF4ECF3C11D6B76F0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> from "Simon St.Laurent" at Sep 23, 2002 05:38:34 PM

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> Cool.  Can/will Shemp/XOM deal with cases where information isn't
> well-formed?  That seems to be one of the key entertainments in moving
> between events and trees.

No.  XOM is meant for XML, not random markup.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer
mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality
is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction,
as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract.
       --_Specht v. Netscape_

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: parser models
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: parser models
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Fwd: War of Attrition (was: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial))
• Next by Date: RE: parser models
• Previous by thread: Re: parser models
• Next by thread: Re: parser models
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread