Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
John Cowan <jcowan@r...> wrote: [Eric van der Vlist:] |> On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 01:07, Arjun Ray wrote: | |>> AFAICS, a parser should cover everything in the infoset. | | Note that what got into the infoset was a purely arbitrary choice | by yours truly, with an eye to SAX, DOM (much diminished later) and | XPath. There is nothing normative about the selections, How mutable is the spec, then? | and saying "but it's in the infoset!" is no sort of reason why a | parser ought to support something. Infoset conformance depends on | documenting what you in fact do support, neither more nor less. Yes, but in what terms is the documentation expressed? Is there an "infoset-speak" behind the scenes? |> infortunate that there is no XML serialization of the XML infoset (and | | The serialization of the XML Infoset is XML. But not necessarily the original document, right?
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format