Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
> On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 01:07, Arjun Ray wrote: > AFAICS, a parser should cover everything in the infoset. Note that what got into the infoset was a purely arbitrary choice by yours truly, with an eye to SAX, DOM (much diminished later) and XPath. There is nothing normative about the selections, and saying "but it's in the infoset!" is no sort of reason why a parser ought to support something. Infoset conformance depends on documenting what you in fact do support, neither more nor less. > infortunate that there is no XML serialization of the XML infoset (and The serialization of the XML Infoset is XML. > that the PSVI wants to follow the same path -a different story and one > of my favorite rants-). I agree with you here. -- Some people open all the Windows; John Cowan wise wives welcome the spring jcowan@r... by moving the Unix. http://www.reutershealth.com --ad for Unix Book Units (U.K.) http://www.ccil.org/~cowan (see http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/unix3image.gif)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format