|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages
At 02:09 PM 9/17/2002 -0400, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: >At 1:13 PM -0700 9/17/02, Ann Navarro wrote: > >>XHTML 2.0 is an XML application, and is not going to be based upon an >>assumed arcane knowledge of it's semantics, or a requirement for >>hard-wired DTDs. Let's stop that assumption quickly. > > >The why define XHTML 2.0 at all? Why not just use raw XML? Why use any agreed upon XML vocabulary? Why not just use raw XML all the time? Ann
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








