Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages
At 02:09 PM 9/17/2002 -0400, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: >At 1:13 PM -0700 9/17/02, Ann Navarro wrote: > >>XHTML 2.0 is an XML application, and is not going to be based upon an >>assumed arcane knowledge of it's semantics, or a requirement for >>hard-wired DTDs. Let's stop that assumption quickly. > > >The why define XHTML 2.0 at all? Why not just use raw XML? Why use any agreed upon XML vocabulary? Why not just use raw XML all the time? Ann
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format