|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: URIs harmful
If practical experience matters, I have implemented a system where we use URIs as namespaces and (1) the URIs have (domain-specific) meaning and (2) there are a number of (fixed) resources at the end of the URIs. I find there are a great number of advantages to this system. This is not to say that namespaces that are URIs *must* have meaning or have (fixed) resource(s) at the end of them (that would be contrary to the spec, after all), it is simply to say that if you do so and can get others to follow the system, there are benefits. One of the advantages is that in this way we have been able to "fix" meaning in the system (to use the term loosely, we've created our own little "semantic web"). What I find somewhat ironic/puzzling is that (1) the system has some similarities to Microsoft's use of "namespaces" in .NET (so I think Joshua position is a bit odd) and (2) TimBL wants to create a "semantic web" but he is against fixing resources at the end of a URI (if my understanding of his writing in correct). If you think of the difference between URI and a citation (especially legal citations) to literature, you may see some benefit. Todd ========================================= Winchel "Todd" Vincent III Attorney and Technical Consultant Project Director, E-CT-Filing Project Georgia State University College of Law Email: winchel@m... Web: http://e-ct-file.gsu.edu/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








