[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: version numbers and infosets

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: version numbers and infosets
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:57:24 +1000
• References: <200207221007.LAA28384@r...> <003601c23184$82f67830$fe193044@tbp1>

From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

> Too bad the only choice is to omit the whole prolog if your versoin number
> would cause trouble, because if you omit it you cannot specify the encoding.

Unless it is time to ditch the "legacy encodings".   It would be very interesting
to see what encodings people (with non-ASCII data!) are actually using.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • version numbers and infosets
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
• Next by Date: RE: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce
• Previous by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread