[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: version numbers and infosets

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: version numbers and infosets
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:00:13 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <003601c23184$82f67830$fe193044@tbp1>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>I see that erratum E38 to the XML 1.0 Rec removed the prescription that it
>is an error to use the wrong version number in the XML declaration.

But it also replaced the VersionNum production with one requiring 1.0.

It is because the Core WG realised that that erratum was over-hastily
accepted that we are soliciting opinions here.

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• References:
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
• Next by Date: RE: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
• Previous by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread