RE: Why datatypes?
schematron uses a different paradigm from RELAX NG and XML-Schema. however, schematron uses this paradigm for somewhat the same purpose as what RELAX NG and XML-Schema do. but I think there recently have been efforts that schematron actually complements what is done by RELAX NG and XML-Schema -- that is very good. I have not followed schematron closely but I think what is really interesting contribution from schematron is the paradigm by which it does things -- the applications where it is useful, I am not sure. Again, if someone could provide some application scenarios and how schematron helps with some technical detail, I would be very glad. thanks and regards - murali. On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > Someone usually does. The SGMLers understand it and practiced it > virtually like a religion (the SGML Way). It gets messy however to > ignore processing contexts if systems are to interoperate without > human interventions. A reason for understanding what features XML > Schema, RELAX NG and/or Schematron enable is to pick the right tool to > get the right strength of agreement. (Am I the only one who considers > Schematron almost heroic? It is the one piece the others need > consistently and why I am holding out for DSDL.)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format