|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Why datatypes?
Someone usually does. The SGMLers understand it and practiced it virtually like a religion (the SGML Way). It gets messy however to ignore processing contexts if systems are to interoperate without human interventions. A reason for understanding what features XML Schema, RELAX NG and/or Schematron enable is to pick the right tool to get the right strength of agreement. (Am I the only one who considers Schematron almost heroic? It is the one piece the others need consistently and why I am holding out for DSDL.) XML starts a layer of agreements. It fixes the first layer and then lets/insists that humans work out the rest. It is the authoritative scope of their results that befuddles and entangles. That is part of the messiness of mixing up standards and specs. It quickly becomes a power trip insteaad of an enabling activity. <offtopic>There was a special last night on the History Channel where a four star from the NSA perfectly explained these distinctions. It was a hopeful omen that there are pockets of authorities with a job to do who understand their job within the scope of their authority.</offtopic> len -----Original Message----- From: Murali Mani [mailto:mani@C...] Is this data vs information well-known?? -- XML is for exchange of data, but XML with schema is for exchange of information. I like that, but was wondering -- someone should have already said this..
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








