Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qu
On Friday 31 May 2002 18:14, David Brownell wrote: > > What is the localName in "foo:bar" and "foo:bar:foo" which are legal > > element names in XML 1.0 and should therefore be passed through when > > namespaces are off? > > I'd expect that localName would still be defined to be the syntactic > "strip off the only prefix" transform of qName that it is in other > cases ... so "foo:bar" would become "bar", and "foo:bar:foo" would > be an error (normally reported as an empty localName). I don't think that makes much sense... If namespaces are off, then there is no such thing as a prefix to be stripped off. And raising an error for the latter would be a strange decision knowing that it's a legal name when namespaces are off. -- Robin Berjon <robin@k...> -- for hire: http://robin.berjon.com/ Avoid clichés like the plague.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format