[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions

• To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>,xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 12:20:24 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020513064214.04343f10@n...>
• References: <1861755499334.20020512172932@j...><5.1.0.14.0.20020513064214.04343f10@n...>

At 6:45 AM -0700 5/13/02, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>At 02:00 PM 5/12/2002 -0400, Mike Champion wrote:
>>Nevertheless, if WG's don't define what the minimum interoperability
>>profile for a spec is, someone else will step in to do it for
>>them.
>
>For XQuery, some people have suggested the following conformance levels:
>
>1. Some implementations use only built-in types, and can not import a schema.
>2. Some implementations may not be able to do static type checking.
>

What do you mean by "built-in types"? What typing information would 
be used for parsed input documents?
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|             http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
• Next by Date: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Previous by thread: XML/XQuery Usage Assumptions (was Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 -Assumptions)
• Next by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread