[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: REST

• To: 'John Evdemon' <jevdemon@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 16:57:30 -0500

Particularly given the problem of procuring a system that 
uses it.

I may seem facetious, but I'm trying to get XMLers to stop 
and ask themselves how a customer buys XML systems from them, 
or in short, how to RFP an XML system?   One doesn't simply 
say (although many RFPs really do), "I want to buy XML.  Tell 
me how much it costs?"  because the answer is, "Sure, give us a 
lot of money".

len


From: John Evdemon [mailto:jevdemon@a...]

Sounds interesting, but XML 1.0 is (imho) not among the TR's that 
need refactoring.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• Next by Date: Re: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN:RESTTutorial)
• Previous by thread: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• Next by thread: RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread