RE: SemWeb again
On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 17:27, Danny Ayers wrote: > Today we have the web. Discounting Web Services and the Semantic Web, what > happens next? > > What is the third way, Simon? The Web (and the Internet, of course). Nothing particularly special, no Apollo project to build wonderful frameworks that solve all problems. My feeling, and it may well be naive, is that people are still figuring out what XML is good for, and perhaps more precisely what it is good at. I have a strong feeling that consortia and companies are trying to develop ahead of the curve so that they can control the curve. I have strong doubts that the approach makes sense given the enormous scope of the Web and the terms under which it flourishes. While XML has succeeded in bringing generalized markup to a very large audience of potential users as a probable ingredient in a wide variety of solutions, it's only a starting point for the vast amount of information modeling left to do in the world, not a magic container that fixes all problems. A number of people have pointed out that the greatest successes of the W3C have been more or less standardizations and simplifications of existing practice. While I hope SVG will be an exception to that, the general pattern the discussion suggests is pretty powerful. I can see the W3C as a research lab, or I can see it as an organization that codifies existing practice. I can't say I'm happy about the thought of the W3C codifying the best bets of the research lab, especially given constantly growing impatience. I'd be happy to say let's just see what happens, have the companies back off a little on seeking "Standard" status for their conglomerations of barely proven ideas, and let the Semantic Web folks work in the lab for a while without worrying too terribly much about what comes out of it. RDF is powerful stuff for a lot of people, but I don't feel comfortable inflicting it on people unless they find their problems demand it. Maybe "the Web" it isn't the answer to trapping users in proprietary systems, improving the next quarterly report, or making the history books as a great thinker. Still, it seems like a much wiser approach to me. I mentioned Agent Orange earlier. The chemicals in Agent Orange have another interesting property. They stimulate plants to grow too quickly, exhausting them and eventually killing them. Maybe a little less stimulation is in order now. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format