[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:41:55 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <F148kK5LqN33HFnwpGR00000154@h...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>Painful, yes. But if XML Blueberry goes into XML 1.1 there's going to be 
>breaking changes anyway.

What are you thinking of here?  The aim is for there to be no XML 1.0
documents that don't work with XML 1.1 parsers, and very few cases of
XML 1.0 documents that don't work when relabelled as XML 1.1.

(Possible ones are: documents with unnormalized Unicode, if
normalization checking is required; documents that rely on NEL not
being treated as a line-end; I can't think of any others off-hand.)

Or were you thinking of processors that will need to be changed?

I am surprised by some of the suggestions that have been made here - I
think the Core WG would not even have considered a change that forced
people to re-write most XSLT stylesheets.

-- Richard

• References:
  • Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
    • From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: XHTML survival rate?
• Previous by thread: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread