[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1

• To: richard@c..., xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:27:40 -0700
• Bcc:

I love XSLT.
But it would need to make some changes to work with XML 1.1.
So would XML Schema.
Painful, yes. But if XML Blueberry goes into XML 1.1 there's going to be 
breaking changes anyway. Better to bite the bullet and fix this now, instead 
of mucking around with the problems this causes until XML become almost 
unusable and needs to be dropped for something else.

-Wayne Steele


>From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
>To: xml-dev@l...
>Subject: Re:  [good] Question about NS 1.1
>Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:41:22 +0100 (BST)
>
> >>Here's a proposal for XML 1.1 + Namespaces 1.1: namespace declarations 
>are
> >>decreed not to apply to attribute or element content (listen for the
> >>screams).
>
> >That is an astoundingly good idea.
> >
> >And very much in concert with the spirit of XML 1.0, and Tim Bray's 
>beloved
> >"80/20" point philosophy.
>
>So you place XSLT on the "20" side?
>
>-- Richard
>

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: How do we call Javascript function in XSL file on Netscape (Ver 6.2) browser?
• Next by Date: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Previous by thread: RE: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread