[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1


Re:  WD for Namespaces 1.1
>Is there a good argument why Namespaces-1.1 *shouldn't* be rolled
>into the XML-1.1 req/draft?

A true unification of the XML and Namespaces spec would only make
sense if various other things were done, in particular dealing with
the special-case "pseudo-namespaced" attributes xml:lang and
xml:space.  This would be a good thing, but we decided not to add that
to our task-list right now.

Getting specs done is largely a matter of reducing your ambition to the
point where someone actually has time to do the work...

-- Richard


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.