[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1

• To: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 14:25:50 -0800
• References: <3CAB42D4.1030402@d...> <200204031820.TAA14729@m...> <20020403183305.GA16884@p...> <002201c1db41$a2e79e10$6400a8c0@seairthlaptop>

Seairth Jacobs wrote:
> Well, while Namespaces-1.1 may be strongly tied to XML-1.1, it is not
> necessarily true the other way around.  If Namespaces were to be rolled into
> XML, then Namespaces would have to be implemented along with XML just to be
> able to say that a product is XML-1.1 compliant.

Which is an extremely good thing. It is unfortunate that namespaces were
ever separate from XML, and I'm reasonably certain that the authors of
both specs would have preferred them to be integrated, but were
prevented from so doing due to timing issues.

-- Ron

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@a...>

• References:
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Adam Turoff <ziggy@p...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread