• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: Is "apos" still valid as per XML specs?
• From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 15:56:34 +0100
• Cc: tmutreja@n..., xml <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20020304080342.027d99f0@p...>
• Organization: Eternia Pub. Inc.
• References: <3C8394D9.6C9C9092@n...> <5.1.0.14.2.20020304080342.027d99f0@p...>

* Tim Bray wrote:
>At 09:08 PM 04/03/02 +0530, Tanu Mutreja wrote:
>>Just had a query regarding "apos". It's been marked as deprecated in the
>>latest HTML. Is it not the case with XML?
>
>Ouch.  Why on earth was it deprecated? -Tim

It's use is deprecated if you want compatibility to existing HTML user
agents. This entity hasn't been defined in HTML, hence existing user
agents do not support that entity.

• References:
  • Is "apos" still valid as per XML specs?
    • From: tmutreja@n... (Tanu Mutreja)
  • Re: Is "apos" still valid as per XML specs?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: HTML parser
• Next by Date: Re: Is "apos" still valid as per XML specs?
• Previous by thread: Re: Is "apos" still valid as per XML specs?
• Next by thread: Re: Is "apos" still valid as per XML specs?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread