• To: tmutreja@n..., xml <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Is "apos" still valid as per XML specs?
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 08:04:08 -0800
• In-reply-to: <3C8394D9.6C9C9092@n...>

At 09:08 PM 04/03/02 +0530, Tanu Mutreja wrote:
>Just had a query regarding "apos". It's been marked as deprecated in the
>latest HTML. Is it not the case with XML?

Ouch.  Why on earth was it deprecated? -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is "apos" still valid as per XML specs?
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>

• References:
  • Is "apos" still valid as per XML specs?
    • From: tmutreja@n... (Tanu Mutreja)

• Prev by Date: Re: canonicalization
• Next by Date: Re: canonicalization
• Previous by thread: Is "apos" still valid as per XML specs?
• Next by thread: Re: Is "apos" still valid as per XML specs?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread