Re: REST & types
On Friday 01 March 2002 02:48 pm, Paul Prescod wrote: > I see type safety as being orthogonal to REST. That's why I'm > creating WRDL. If you want type safety, you should get it. If you > don't, you can just ignore WRDL. While I think type *is* orthogonal (as is validation), sooner or later, *something* has to interpret the data and the overloaded methods... thereby introducing the notion of "type"... FWIW. I think WRDL might be damaging to your cause because it makes things look too much like web services. You might be better off defining a mechanism for composition thereby allowing abstraction.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format