• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: REST & types
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 14:48:34 -0500
• References: <200203010356.WAA22071@m...>

Mark Baker wrote:
> 
> > So here's a question. If I *wanted* type safety what do I do?
> 
> Type binding occurs very late in REST.  Do it with HEAD or GET (such
> as invoking a GET and Accepting RDF).

I see type safety as being orthogonal to REST. That's why I'm creating
WRDL. If you want type safety, you should get it. If you don't, you can
just ignore WRDL.

 Paul Prescod

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: REST & types
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
  • Re: REST & types
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: REST as RPC done right
• Next by Date: Re: REST & types
• Previous by thread: RE: RE: REST & types
• Next by thread: Re: REST & types
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread