[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Yep - I've done quite a lot of work on Schemas with both (.NET and MSXML) and found compliance to be very good. Although i am guessing the latest SP1 for MSXML brought even more compliance (i guess coz i can't find a resource that details the updates), I haven't heard too many rumblings about non-compliance. cheers, Steven http://deltabis.com/steven ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@s...> To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>; "Paul Spencer" <paul.spencer@a...>; "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@d...>; <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:59 PM Subject: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ? > At 11:56 AM 3/20/2002 -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote: > > >The big selling point of XML is that it allows interoperability which we > >who work on the XML technologies at Microsoft are behind 100%. > > > >Thus I nominate our implementations (XmlValidatingReader in .NET and > >MSXML) as validating processors that do a good job of following the XML > >Schema recommendation. > > Anybody outside of Microsoft have enough experience with this software to > comment on the compatibility of these tools with the XML Schema spec? > > Jonathan > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> >
|

Cart



