[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Yep - I've done quite a lot of work on Schemas with both (.NET and MSXML)
and found compliance to be very good.

Although i am guessing the latest SP1 for MSXML brought even more compliance
(i guess coz i can't find a resource that details the updates), I haven't
heard too many rumblings about non-compliance.

cheers,
Steven
http://deltabis.com/steven


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@s...>
To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>; "Paul Spencer"
<paul.spencer@a...>; "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@d...>;
<xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:59 PM
Subject: RE:  Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?


> At 11:56 AM 3/20/2002 -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>
> >The big selling point of XML is that it allows interoperability which we
> >who work on the XML technologies at Microsoft are behind 100%.
> >
> >Thus I nominate our implementations (XmlValidatingReader in .NET and
> >MSXML) as validating processors that do a good job of following the XML
> >Schema recommendation.
>
> Anybody outside of Microsoft have enough experience with this software to
> comment on the compatibility of these tools with the XML Schema spec?
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member