• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Does XML-Dev matter?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 20 Mar 2002 10:02:48 -0500
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020320064140.04ad5dc0@157.189.161.214>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020320064140.04ad5dc0@157.189.161.214>

On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 06:50, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> At 10:02 AM 3/20/2002 +0100, Nicolas LEHUEN wrote:
> >It seems that xml-dev is going through a metaphysics crisis these days...
> 
> I didn't really mean the "Does XML-Dev matter" thread to be metaphysics.

And I was joking as well.  I should use those smiley-faces more often.

> Don't get me wrong. I like coffee-break musings. But let's not take
> ourselves too seriously here.

Sounds like an opportunity to relax a bit!

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • RE: Does XML-Dev matter?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@s...>

• Prev by Date: How to handle content vs. context markup?
• Next by Date: RE: which came first: content or markup?
• Previous by thread: RE: Does XML-Dev matter?
• Next by thread: Re: Does XML-Dev matter?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread