• To: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>, "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Does XML-Dev matter?
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@s...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 06:50:09 -0500
• In-reply-to: <575CBD83AE7DD411A23500B0D049C2F9C07795@SRVSOCRATE>

At 10:02 AM 3/20/2002 +0100, Nicolas LEHUEN wrote:
>It seems that xml-dev is going through a metaphysics crisis these days...

I didn't really mean the "Does XML-Dev matter" thread to be metaphysics.

There are people who represent this list as a kind of industry consensus, 
gauging the importance of new technologies by their reception on this list. 
I like this list - and the people on this list - but I suspect we are not a 
representative cross-sample of industry. I also suspect that our many 
confident assertions about which technologies probably fall more into the 
category of coffee-break musings than prophecy.

Don't get me wrong. I like coffee-break musings. But let's not take 
ourselves too seriously here.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Does XML-Dev matter?
    • From: Adam Turoff <ziggy@p...>
  • RE: Does XML-Dev matter?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Does XML-Dev matter?
    • From: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by Date: Announce: DocBook V4.2 Release Candidate 1
• Previous by thread: RE: Does XML-Dev matter?
• Next by thread: RE: Does XML-Dev matter?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread