• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: What is an XML Document? [Was: Re: canonicalization]
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 16:15:26 -0800
• In-reply-to: <20020305161112.G18835@r...>
• References: <p04330108b8aacb376a2d@[192.168.254.4]><1015201142.3309.108.camel@l...><3C82B747.5020609@t...><20020304025635.C18835@r...><3C833AB2.3040807@t...><20020304043645.E18835@r...><5.1.0.14.2.20020304104526.027d51b0@p...><20020304194440.S18835@r...><p04330101b8a9ed40131e@[192.168.254.4]><20020305135600.F18835@r...><p04330108b8aacb376a2d@[192.168.254.4]>

At 04:11 PM 05/03/02 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>  For me there is no doubt that the document is the set. Well formedness
>is defined for the set, and a well formedness error detected when parsing
>an external entity affects the whole document.
>
>  Anyway, even if the REC may be ambiguous, from a programmer viewpoint the 
>document instance will likely to be based on those extra sets, XPath 
>for example requiring them.

More good arguments for getting rid of entities. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: What is an XML Document? [Was: Re: canonicalization]
    • From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@e...>
  • Re: Re: What is an XML Document? [Was: Re: canonicalization]
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • Re: What is an XML Document? [Was: Re: canonicalization]
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: canonicalization
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: canonicalization
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: canonicalization
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • Re: canonicalization
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: canonicalization
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • Re: canonicalization
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: canonicalization
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • What is an XML Document? [Was: Re: canonicalization]
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: What is an XML Document? [Was: Re: canonicalization]
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • Re: What is an XML Document? [Was: Re: canonicalization]
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: JSP or XSL?
• Next by Date: Re: Unnecessary decoration (was Re: Stupid Question)
• Previous by thread: Re: What is an XML Document? [Was: Re: canonicalization]
• Next by thread: Re: Re: What is an XML Document? [Was: Re: canonicalization]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread