[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: canonicalization

Re:  canonicalization
Daniel Veillard wrote:

>>Despite the fact that XInclude seems like an obviously-good idea, I
>>do not observe a rush of implementations nor people complaining about
>>the recommendation not being done.  I'm not sure, to be honest, if
>>the world really eneds it.  I don't for any of my work.  -Tim
>   I have at least one large user relying on it. They do DocBook
> processing and XInclude allows to split the document like external
> parsed entities. But the XInclude chunks can be DTD validated 
> directly contrary to entities. 

Could you achieve the same effect with a perl script?

I'm beginning to think that trying to do cheap content management
down in the markup just doesn't have a positive payoff. -Tim


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.