Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 5:04 PM -0500 3/3/02, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >I see what you mean, but I'd expect the canonicalization to have already >performed that resolution, and halted if it encountered a fall back. >The canonicalized document sent to me would have no risk of "backhoe >errors" modifying the meaning of the document, much as canonicalization >currently removes the risk of external entities suffering backhoe >errors. > However, that's not an option in the current XInclude draft. It specifically states in section 4.4 Fallback Behavior: XInclude processors must perform fallback behavior in the event of a resource error, as follows: If you turn off fallbacks, then you're not doing XInclude processing according to the latest CR. The fallback option is a critical difference between XInclude and external entities. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
