• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:00:06 -0800
• Bcc:

I think "Schrodinger type" is a much better name than "Ur type".
The W3C should issue an addendum to rename it.

-Wayne Steele


>From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
>
>Meaning? You want meaning?
>
>As Dare assures me (and the rest of us ignorami who are not W3C members)
>Henry's got the technical issues regarding the Schrodinger type nailed down
>in his forthcoming erratum.
>
>As for purpose and intent, I assume it was done so that all types are based
>on a single root. Defining empty content this way is perfectly consistent
>with how restriction works, BTW.
>
>


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

• Prev by Date: RE: FW: what's wrong with this?
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Training
• Previous by thread: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by thread: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread