• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 02 Mar 2002 14:09:26 -0500
• In-reply-to: <003401c1c20f$efb35590$0bf13044@tbp>
• References: <ZVVPLGFDMHFD73KGC0A8QLMIMG3VB0JF.3c80fc7f@MChamp> <003401c1c20f$efb35590$0bf13044@tbp>

On Sat, 2002-03-02 at 12:30, Thomas B. Passin wrote: 
> It would be interesting to learn what other kinds of non-xml SAX generators
> people have written.  Anyone care to say?

Regular Fragmentations[1] currently converts non-angle-bracket notation
inside of XML documents into SAX events, and I'm working on extending
that functionality beyond an XML context.

[1] - http://www.simonstl.com/projects/fragment/

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• Next by Date: Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• Previous by thread: Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• Next by thread: Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread