• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 11:42:33 -0600
• References: <ZVVPLGFDMHFD73KGC0A8QLMIMG3VB0JF.3c80fc7f@MChamp> <003401c1c20f$efb35590$0bf13044@tbp>

> It would be interesting to learn what other kinds of non-xml SAX
generators
> people have written.  Anyone care to say?

Folks working on Pascal versions of SAX (myself included) have made a few
classes that are similar-- one takes values from an object, using RTTI and
writes them to XML-- it can also read the values back and generate Schemas
based on the psosible vlaues-- it is a cheap form of serialization. Much
like your Python Parser, I wrote a wrapper around a Pascal Parser...  you
can generate a marked up version of a Pascal source file and generate
documentation based on that using any XSLT stylesheet you want...

Jeff Rafter
Defined Systems
http://www.defined.net
XML Development and Developer Web Hosting

• References:
  • Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• Next by Date: Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• Previous by thread: Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• Next by thread: Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread