[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language

Re:  XML should NOT be a new programming language
At 10:52 AM 04/03/02 +0000, Francis Norton wrote:
>Yes - you can implement XML interfaces between components in at least four ways:
>[1] pass an XML document
>[2] pass an XML DOM
>[3] pass a schema-equivalent programming language object (using tools for automatic schema <-> class conversion)
>[4] pass an event stream
>Our experiences suggest that [3] and [4] are best for high-volume performance-critical server-side finance applications.

You're buying some performance.  You're giving up a lot of the
things that make XML worthwhile, in particular no binary
dependencies on any particular hardware, OS, or whatever.
Your call.  But it feels like a lousy bargain, architecturally,
compared to [1].  -Tim


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.