• To: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <clbullar@i...>, 'Mike Champion' <mc@x...>, "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• From: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
• Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:05:11 +0100

Building for the future does not necessarely mean we must stick to the past.

Regards,
Nicolas

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...]
>Envoyé : mardi 5 mars 2002 16:43
>À : Nicolas LEHUEN; 'Mike Champion'; 'xml-dev@l...'
>Objet : RE:  XML doesn't deserve its "X".
>
>
>As Larry pointed out, programs written in C still 
>run today on Linux?  Why didn't we stop there?
>
>len
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nicolas LEHUEN [mailto:nicolas.lehuen@u...]
>
>There is a related link on Cafe con Leche (thanks Elliote) :
>
>http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_534847.html?menu=news.late
>stheadlines
>
>Laser discs wrote 15 years ago can't be read... What about the Web ? We
>still can browse a part of the web's past thanks to the 
>Internet Archive
>(http://www.archive.org/), but how will we do this in 5 or 10 
>years, when
>common browsers will support different standards ?
>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Next by Date: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Previous by thread: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Next by thread: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread