• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 21:05:29 -0500
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020320091140.0417eb80@157.189.161.214>

[Jonathan Robie
>
> 2. If the spec is clear and the implementation simply does not implement
> the spec, let the vendor know the problem, and that compatibility really
> matters to you. Let's put pressure on the vendors.
>

Compatibility matters especially for xml schema!  It's so hard to get an
xml-schema schema right, let alone to validate against it except with a
tool, there's no point to it except to be able to validate.  Otherwise we
might as well use asn.1 as an informal schema language to indicate structure
and constaints (this is not a slur against asn.1, BTW, for it could do a
good part of the schema job of indicating structure pretty well).

Cheers,

Tom P

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>

• References:
  • RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: which came first: content or markup?
• Next by Date: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by thread: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread