• To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• From: Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:10:16 +0000
• In-reply-to: <002201c1d07c$e06545a0$0bf13044@tbp>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020320091140.0417eb80@157.189.161.214> <002201c1d07c$e06545a0$0bf13044@tbp>

On Thursday 21 March 2002 02:05, Thomas B. Passin wrote:

> Otherwise we
> might as well use asn.1 as an informal schema language to indicate
> structure and constaints (this is not a slur against asn.1, BTW, for it
> could do a good part of the schema job of indicating structure pretty
> well).

[cough, ahem] *informal*? With the addition of XML as an ASN.1 encoding 
ruleset, ASN.1 can now be used as an XML schema language :-)

>
> Cheers,
>
> Tom P
>

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software  

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• References:
  • RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@s...>
  • Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Does XML-Dev matter?
• Next by Date: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by thread: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread