• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XSLT and the 80/20 point (was RE: Tim Bray on"Which Technologies Matter?")
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 13:17:46 -0500
• In-reply-to: <NDBBLMPNADEOOKGELJALCEEDCIAA.elenz@x...>

3/18/2002 1:07:40 PM, "Evan Lenz" <elenz@x...> wrote:

> On the other hand, difficulty of comprehension should not be a
>criterion. XSLT is a difficult language, because its most powerful
>mechanism--template rules--is new and unusual to many programmers, and
>therefore hard to learn.

Fair enough.  I'll gladly concede the point.  Thanks for reminding us 
that something can be difficult for the uninitiated to grasp, but 
still hit the 80/20 point.

• References:
  • XSLT and the 80/20 point (was RE: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?")
    • From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@x...>

• Prev by Date: XSLT and the 80/20 point (was RE: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?")
• Next by Date: RE: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Previous by thread: XSLT and the 80/20 point (was RE: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?")
• Next by thread: RE: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread