• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 08:32:23 +0000
• In-reply-to: <200203060138.g261ctu10329@d...>
• References: <2X3W74B8GAHBN4Z63D8A6KFZIHHGNJ.3c855805@MChamp><2X3W74B8GAHBN4Z63D8A6KFZIHHGNJ.3c855805@MChamp>

[Joe English]

>The general idea of Infoset augmentation is I think very useful,
>but I'm starting to think that doing it as part of validation
>is not a good idea.

Amen.

Sean

• References:
  • Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserveits "X".)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Visiting your cake and eating it too (was Stupid Question)
• Next by Date: Re: Visiting your cake and eating it too (was Stupid Question)
• Previous by thread: Re: Visiting your cake and eating it too (was StupidQuestion)
• Next by thread: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread