• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserveits "X".)
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 18:43:01 -0500
• In-reply-to: <200203052255.g25MtFu08125@d...>

3/5/2002 5:55:15 PM, Joe English <jenglish@f...> wrote:


>I'm having a hard time envisioning a scenario where having
>'xsi:type' would be useful to an application.

Well, I have that same problem with the PSVI :~)  Seriously,
would this apply to having the PSVI tell you the type of
the element as well as having xsi:type tell you the type
of the element?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• References:
  • Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
• Next by Date: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
• Previous by thread: Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
• Next by thread: Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread