• To: "Mike Champion" <mc@x...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XML is easy, was: Re: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:14:56 -0500
• References: <XVYSJH4WYTD9542WJH1LI97UJHZT75.3c48ab86@MChamp>

Mike Champion wrote:
>
> The issues here aren't with XML 1.0 so much as with DOM, XSLT, SVG,
> CSS, etc. I'm saying "just make SURE that the complex stuff those
> wizards and GUIs generate truly interoperate," don't take the
> vendor's word for it. "We make it easy" is the first step down the
> road to interoperability Hell. Is that really so unfair, to MS or
> anyone else?
>
Amen Mike, I mean if you guys can't commit to a conformant implementation,
don't let the REC out the door.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML is easy, was: Re: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>

• References:
  • Re: XML is easy, was: Re: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDDL (was RE: Negotiate Out The Noise)
• Next by Date: RE: XML is easy, was: Re: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Previous by thread: Re: XML is easy, was: Re: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Next by thread: Re: XML is easy, was: Re: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread