Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> Mike Champion wrote: > > > > The issues here aren't with XML 1.0 so much as with DOM, XSLT, SVG, > > CSS, etc. I'm saying "just make SURE that the complex stuff those > > wizards and GUIs generate truly interoperate," don't take the > > vendor's word for it. "We make it easy" is the first step down the > > road to interoperability Hell. Is that really so unfair, to MS or > > anyone else? > > > Amen Mike, I mean if you guys can't commit to a conformant implementation, > don't let the REC out the door. > One more thought: How many validators can validate XHTML 1.1? MSXML bags it because it doesn't accept defaulted xmlns attributes -- and since validation is all XML 1.0, I can't see why that should have bearing on validation. How many DTD/schema editors can edit the XHTML 1.1 (e.g. Modularization) DTD? None I've found. This is a disaster. You have a full W3C recommendation for the latest _XHTML_ of all things -- not like its intended to be some fringe specification, and nothing seems capable of dealing with it properly. Who is at fault here? Jonathan
|
